Here’s how TED introduces the presentation below:
In a presentation that can only be described as epic, comedian Charles Fleischer delivers a hysterical send-up of a time-honored TED theme: the map. Geometry, numbers, charts and stamp art also factor in (somehow), as he weaves together a unique theory of everything called "Moleeds."
His presentation is designed to make fun of scientists and the scientific method and more importantly, of the disconnect they sometimes experience from everyday people’s points of view. We’re also being told that stamps are featured prominently because he (Charles Fleischer) doesn’t have to worry about copyrights. And that might be true, since stamp designs are most likely owned by the Postal Service (not the musical group) which is almost everywhere a governmental organization.
While this was probably a joke, we looked at whether this is true or not. And we found a question asked and answered on a webmaster forum:
nonni
#:928034
5:27 am on June 18, 2006 (utc 0)There are several postage stamps from a variety of countries that are 'relevant' to my site. All across the web, I see stamp collecting sites that scan and post images of stamps. Is it legal to post blue widget stamps on my blue widget page (visual content)?
Syzygy
#:928036
11:15 am on June 19, 2006 (utc 0)Hmm, can't believe I actually tracked down and emailed a group head of IP at the UK's Royal Mail to find out more about this... :-)
My interpretation is:
In the broadest of terms the following applies to the reproduction of stamps in the UK and USA.
stamps are subject to copyright. In many cases stamps are also trademarked (the Penny Black, for example). In order to reproduce them in any form you must apply to the postal service (Royal Mail/USPS) for a special licence relative to the application of the reproduction.
Dependent, there may be fees involved (primarily administration fees). The process will likely involve submitting for approval the design in which a reproduction is incorporated.
As stated, this is only my interpretation based on what I've learnt; the best thing to do is some homework:
Links (if allowed): Royal Mail reproduction guidelines, USPS Licensing.
Hope that's of some use.
Syzygy
That says it all.
Sources / More info: ted-fleischer, wmw-stamps, yt-moleeds
Youtube Motivation Playlists: HighSpiritDK, aamirkm1, THREAAAT, coachsuds, dborgellul, dickiepipes, camila059, ernied101, davecalixto, miguelpena123, bradley633, djmmorrison, VBKhandai
you quite obviously missed the point of the presentation it was a string theory that with that knowledge you could use maths to calculate the entire known universe it is the key to unlocking all the information out there.
ReplyDeleteAs for copy right.
As for copyright i have this to add.
Therefore an unpublished work by an author who died before 1918, published after commencement of the 1988 Act, will expire at the end of 2039. However, if a work by an author who died in, say, 1870 was published in 1970 (i.e. before the 1988 Act), its copyright would expire 50 years after 1970, i.e. in 2020.
how old do you think the stamps he used were?
Exactly.
Have a nice day.
"If an unpublished work was published before the 1988 Act came into force, and the author had been dead for more than 50 years, the work remained in copyright for 50 years from the end of the year of publication.
ReplyDeleteIf an unpublished work is published after the 1988 Act came into force, and the author had been dead for more than 50 years, its copyright will expire at the end of 2039. Later amendments have altered this to include only authors who died more than 70 years before the Act came into force.
Therefore an unpublished work by an author who died before 1918, published after commencement of the 1988 Act, will expire at the end of 2039. However, if a work by an author who died in, say, 1870 was published in 1970 (i.e. before the 1988 Act), its copyright would expire 50 years after 1970, i.e. in 2020."
Just clearing up the quote i didn't want you to get confused.
I probably missed the point not only of the presentation, but also of your comment. Anyway, thanks for the clarification :)
ReplyDelete